An expert panel constituted by the ministry of corporate affairs (MCA) has recommended that Advocates Act be amended to allow audit firms to offer legal services a proposal which is being opposed by law firms. The MCA panel, which was set up to look into the regulation of audit firms and their networks, is of the view that development of multi-disciplinary practice (MDP) firms should be facilitated in the country, and to meet this goal, auditors should be allowed to expand their portfolio of services. The report states that in 2015, the Society of Indian Law Firms had complained to the Delhi Bar Council against the ‘Big 4’ — PwC, Deloitte, KPMG, and EY — for unauthorised practice of law. But at the same time, law firms are diversifying into MDPs such as forensic operations and undertaking commercial diligence and investigation for their clients. For instance, the report states, AZ&B Partners reportedly hired six forensic experts from EY. The expert panel has recommended that international brand names for audit firms should be allowed If this proposal is accepted, it would mean that the Indian affiliates or ‘network firms’ can officially use the names of the Big 4 while auditing balance sheets. And if the proposal to allow audit firms to provide legal services is accepted too, lawyers apprehend that it could create a scenario where the Big 4 could also offer legal services, at a time when foreign law firms are not allowed to operate in the country. Any law that is there for some time needs amendment and Advocates Act is no exception. If multinational law firms or foreign lawyers come to India it would create healthy competition. But what should not be allowed is CA and CS firms practicing law and starting law firms. This would only create havoc and it would be very difficult for any regulator to manage them, said Lalit Bhasin. Bhasin added that allowing multi-disciplinary practice would be a ‘retrograde step’ as it would destroy independence* of the legal profession, which would become a business.